Local vs Cloud Trade Copier: Data Flow and Latency Analysis

When a trade copier replicates a market order across multiple futures accounts, the time between the leader's fill and the follower's fill depends on one thing above all else: where the copier software is running. A local copier on your home PC or VPS crosses the public internet twice for every copied trade. A cloud copier in a Chicago datacenter can complete the same operation in under 5 milliseconds.

This article breaks down the data flow for each architecture step by step, using Tradovate's API as a working example. You'll see exactly where latency enters the system and why the gap between 30-160ms (local) and 3-5ms (cloud) matters for active futures traders managing multiple accounts.

How a Futures Broker API Processes Orders

Before comparing copier architectures, you need to understand how an order flows through the broker's system. The copying mechanism sits on top of this process, so every millisecond in the broker's pipeline directly affects how fast a copier can operate.

When you place a market order through Tradovate, the process follows this path:

1. Order submission. Your trading application (web browser, NinjaTrader, mobile app, or custom software) sends an order request to Tradovate. Tradovate's API servers are located in Chicago, IL.
2. Validation and routing. Tradovate validates the order against your account's margin requirements and risk limits. Once validated, the order is routed to the CME Globex electronic matching engine in Aurora, Illinois, roughly 30 miles west of Chicago.
3. Matching. CME's matching engine processes the order against the order book. If a counterparty exists at your price, the trade is filled immediately. Market orders fill against the best available price.
4. Execution report. The fill confirmation (execution report) travels back from CME to Tradovate's servers, then out to every client that has an active WebSocket connection to that account.

That last point is the key to understanding trade copiers. Tradovate pushes execution reports to all connected clients in real-time. If a local copier on your PC is connected to the leader account, it receives the report over the internet. If a cloud copier in Chicago is connected to the same account, it receives the exact same report with far less network delay.

Local Trade Copier: Architecture and Data Flow

A local trade copier runs as desktop software on your computer or on a rented VPS (Virtual Private Server). It connects to the broker's API from wherever your machine is physically located. The following diagram traces the complete data flow from order placement to follower fill.

Here's the critical path through this diagram. Steps 4, 5, and 6-7 determine how long followers wait after the leader is filled:

Step 4: Execution report returns to your PC (15-80ms). The leader account is filled at the exchange. Tradovate pushes the fill notification over your WebSocket connection. The report crosses the internet from Chicago to wherever your PC is located. A trader in New York sees about 15-20ms. Los Angeles is 40-60ms. Europe is 80-100ms or more.

Copier processing (1-2ms). Your local copier receives the report, identifies the leader account, looks up which followers need matching orders, calculates position ratios, and prepares the follower order requests.

Step 5: Follower orders sent back to Chicago (15-80ms). The copier sends orders for each follower account from your PC over the internet to Tradovate's API. This is the same distance as step 4, in reverse.

Steps 6-7: Followers routed and filled (<2ms). Once orders arrive at Tradovate, they're routed to CME and filled. This happens entirely within Chicago-area infrastructure.

The total copying delay is dominated by those two internet traversals in steps 4 and 5. For a trader who is 40ms from Chicago, that's roughly 80ms of pure network latency added to every copied trade, before accounting for any processing time.

Cloud Trade Copier: Architecture and Data Flow

The label "cloud-based" alone does not guarantee low latency. A cloud trade copier only achieves the performance shown below if its servers are physically located in the Chicago area, where Tradovate, Rithmic, and CME all operate. A cloud copier hosted in Virginia, Frankfurt, or any other region would still pay significant network latency to reach Chicago, much like a local copier does. For this analysis, we're looking at a properly colocated cloud copier, like FutuCopy, that runs in a Chicago-area datacenter and maintains persistent connections to all your accounts from that location.

The first three steps are identical to the local setup. You still place the order from your PC, it still travels over the internet to Tradovate, and it still gets routed to CME for matching. Nothing changes about how the leader order is processed.

The difference starts at step 4.

Step 4: Execution report goes to the cloud copier (1-2ms). FutuCopy trade copier maintains persistent WebSocket connections to all your accounts from its Chicago server. When the leader's fill is confirmed, Tradovate pushes the execution report over a local datacenter network connection. Instead of 15-80ms across the internet, this takes 1-2ms.

Step 5: Follower orders sent to Tradovate (1-2ms). The copier processes the fill and sends orders for each follower account. Since the copier and Tradovate are both in Chicago, this network hop is another 1-2ms.

Steps 6-7: Followers routed and filled (<2ms). Same as before. Orders go to CME, fills come back. All within Chicago.

The total time from leader fill to follower fill is 3-5ms. In many cases, the followers are filled before the original execution report even reaches your PC. You place a trade, and by the time you see the confirmation on your screen, your follower accounts are already filled.

Latency Breakdown: Step by Step

The table below compares each step of the copying process for both architectures. Latency values represent typical ranges. Actual performance varies based on network conditions, broker load, and geographic distance from Chicago.

The difference comes down to steps 4 and 5. The local copier pays the full internet round-trip penalty twice. FutuCopy replaces those with datacenter-internal network hops that are 10-40x faster. A cloud copier hosted outside the Chicago area would not see this improvement.

Visual comparison: leader fill to follower fill

To put this in context: on the ES (E-mini S&P 500) contract, a single tick is worth $12.50. During volatile moves, the ES can travel multiple ticks within 100ms. If a local copier's 100ms delay means each follower fills one tick worse, and you're running 10 followers, that's $125 in slippage on a single trade. Over hundreds of trades, the cost is significant.

The Compounding Effect with Multiple Followers

The latency problem gets worse as you add more follower accounts. Consider how a local copier handles 20 followers.

The copier on your PC receives the leader's execution report (15-80ms over the internet). It then builds order requests for all 20 followers and sends them from your PC back over the internet (another 15-80ms). Depending on the copier's implementation, it may send orders sequentially (adding small delays between each) or in parallel (competing for your outbound bandwidth). Either way, all 20 orders must traverse the same internet path from your location to Chicago.

FutuCopy sends those 20 follower orders over a local datacenter network. The round trip to Tradovate's API is 1-2ms regardless of how many orders you're sending. The broker receives all 20 orders in rapid succession, and they arrive at CME's matching engine nearly simultaneously.

This is particularly relevant for prop firm traders who commonly manage 5-20+ funded accounts. The more accounts you run, the more important it becomes that your copier is physically close to the broker infrastructure.

Why Chicago Colocation Matters for Futures

All US futures trading flows through the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME Group). The CME's electronic matching engine, Globex, operates from datacenters in the Chicago metropolitan area, primarily in Aurora, IL. Every futures order ultimately passes through this infrastructure.

As a result, every major futures brokerage platform has its core servers near CME:

• Tradovate
• Rithmic
• CQG
• NinjaTrader: connects through Rithmic or CQG

For a trade copier, being in Chicago means being within 1-2 milliseconds of every major futures broker API. This isn't about high-frequency trading or microsecond arbitrage. It's about practical execution quality: when your copier is 1-2ms from the broker instead of 40-80ms, there's simply less time for the market to move between your leader fill and your follower fills.

The physics are straightforward. Light travels through fiber optic cable at roughly 200,000 km/s (about two-thirds the speed of light in vacuum). New York to Chicago is approximately 1,150 km by fiber route, giving a minimum one-way latency of about 5.7ms. In practice, routing, switching, and protocol overhead push this to 12-20ms. For Los Angeles (2,800 km by fiber), the minimum is 14ms, but real-world latency is 35-55ms. From London, it's 80-100ms or more. No amount of bandwidth or hardware acceleration can overcome the physical distance.

What About Limit Orders?

Users of local trade copiers can use limit orders to mitigate fill-based copy latency, but the more accounts you manage, the greater the risk of synchronization issues in fast-moving markets, depending on your trading style.

The inherent latency of local copiers still applies when modifying or canceling limit orders from the leader account. Every modification must travel from your PC to the broker and back for each follower, adding the same round-trip delays described above.

Beyond Latency: Reliability and Uptime

Latency is the most visible advantage of a Chicago-hosted cloud trade copier, but reliability matters just as much for traders managing funded accounts.

A local copier requires your PC or VPS to stay online and connected during trading hours. Any disruption to your internet service, power supply, or operating system interrupts copy execution. Wi-Fi drops, ISP outages, Windows updates, power fluctuations: all of these can leave your follower accounts out of sync with the leader. If the leader enters a position while the copier is offline, the followers miss the trade entirely.

A properly hosted cloud copier (like FutuCopy's Chicago-based infrastructure) runs in a professional datacenter with redundant power, redundant network connections, and 24/7 monitoring. Your home internet dropping does not affect the copier. If you placed a trade through a mobile app, a different PC, or even the broker's own web interface before losing connectivity, the copier still detects the fill and copies it to every follower.

This also eliminates the need for a dedicated VPS. Local copier users often rent Windows VPS instances (typically $20-50/month) in Chicago to get closer to the brokers and avoid home internet reliability issues. A Chicago-based cloud copier provides that proximity and reliability as part of the service, accessible from any web browser.

For prop firm traders managing funded accounts with strict drawdown limits, uptime is not optional. A missed copy during a winning trade means leaving money on the table across every follower. A missed copy during a losing trade can mean one account is closed while the others remain exposed. Consistency in execution is just as important as speed.

Frequently Asked Questions